I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-285/20) (*)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - European Union word mark NOMAD - Absolute grounds for refusal - Distinctive character - Lack of descriptive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2021/C 329/33)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: MCM Products AG (Zurich, Switzerland) (represented by: S. Eichhammer, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Kondás and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: The Nomad Company BV (Zevenaar, Netherlands) (represented by: S. Tigu, lawyer)
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 March 2020 (Case R 854/2019-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between MCM Products and The Nomad Company.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders MCM Products AG to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 222, 6.7.2020.