- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 July 2012.#Kaimer GmbH & Co. Holding KG and Others v European Commission.#Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Penalty — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Probative value of statements made in the context of the leniency policy.#Case C‑264/11 P.
ECLI:EU:C:2012:498
62011CJ0264
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
3. Appeals — Grounds — Necessity of a specific challenge to a point in the General Court’s reasoning (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58(1); Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 112(1)(1)(c)) (see para. 61)
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 March 2011 in Case T-379/06 Kaimer and Others v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed in part the appellants’ action for annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 4180 final of 20 September 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement concerning a cartel in the copper and copper alloy fittings sector or, in the alternative, for a reduction in the fine imposed on the appellants — Distortion of the evidence — Error of assessment regarding the probative value of statements made in the context of the leniency policy — Infringement of Articles 6 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
Operative part
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Kaimer GmbH & Co. Holding KG, Sanha Kaimer GmbH & Co. KG and Sanha Italia Srl to pay the costs.