- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-243/11: Order of the General Court of 9 November 2011 — Glaxo Group v OHIM — Farmodiética (ADVANCE) (Community trade mark — Applicant represented by a lawyer who is a not a third person — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TB0243
62011TB0243
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.1.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 6/17
(Case T-243/11)(<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Applicant represented by a lawyer who is a not a third person - Inadmissibility)
2012/C 6/32
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Glaxo Group Ltd (Greenford, United Kingdom) (represented by: O. Benito and C. Mansell, Solicitors)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Farmodiética — Cosmética, Dietética e Produtos Farmacêuticos, Lda (Estarda de S. Marcos, Portugal)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 February 2011 (Case R 665/2010-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Farmodiética — Cosmética, Dietética e Produtos Farmacêuticos, Lda and Glaxo Group Ltd.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.Glaxo Group Ltd shall pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 194, 2.7.2011.
Language of the case: English