- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-154/16: Action brought on 14 April 2016 — GRID applications v EUIPO (APlan)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0154
62016TN0154
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 200/29
(Case T-154/16)
(2016/C 200/41)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: GRID applications GmbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: M. Meyenburg, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘APlan’ — Application No 13 374 079
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 February 2016 in Case R 1819/2015-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision, with the result that EUIPO will have to allow Community trade mark application 13374079 to proceed to registration in accordance with the application or, in the alternative, as restricted for the classes of goods and services 9, 35 and 42, or, in any event, solely for Classes 9 and 42;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred in the appeal proceedings before OHIM/EUIPO and in the present proceedings.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 7 of Regulation No 207/2009.