- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-253/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 12 April 2018 — Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CN0253
62018CN0253
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-253/18)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Stadt Euskirchen
Respondent: Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG
Other parties: SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH, RVK Regionalverkehr Köln GmbH
Question referred
Does Article 5(2)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007, (1) which lays down the requirement to perform the major part of the public passenger transport service itself, prevent the internal operator from having that major part of the services performed by a company in which it has a 2,5 % holding and the remaining shares are held directly or indirectly by other competent authorities?
*
(1) Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70 (OJ 2007 L 315, p. 1).