- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-243/16: Action brought on 18 May 2016 – Freddo v EUIPO – Freddo Freddo (Freggo)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0243
62016TN0243
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 243/48
—
(Case T-243/16)
(2016/C 243/54)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Freddo SA (Buenos Aires, Argentina) (represented by: S. Malynicz, QC, K. Gilbert, G. Lodge, Solicitors)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Freddo Freddo, SL (Madrid, Spain)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘Freggo’ – Application for registration No 7 606 064
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 February 2016 in Case R 919/2015-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO (and if it intervenes, the other party to the proceedings before the Office) to pay its own costs and pay those of the applicant.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
—