EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-99/10: Action brought on 2 March 2010 — Meica v OHIM — Tofutown.com (TOFUKING)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TN0099

62010TN0099

March 2, 2010
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/66

(Case T-99/10)

2010/C 113/99

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Meica Ammerländische Fleischwarenfabrik Fritz Meinen GmbH & Co. KG (Edewecht, Germany) (represented by: S. Russlies, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Tofutown.com GmbH (Wiesbaum/Vulkaneifel, Germany)

Form of order sought

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 7 January 2010 (Case R 63/2009-4);

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Tofutown.com GmbH

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘TOFUKING’ for goods in Classes 29, 30 and 32 (Application No 5 027 016)

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the German word mark ‘King’ (trade mark No 30 404 434), the Community word mark ‘Curry King’ (trade mark No 2 885 077) and the German word mark ‘Curry King’ (trade mark No 39 902 969), all three of which were registered for goods in Classes 29 and 30

Decision of the Opposition Division: rejection of the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law: Breach of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) as there is a likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue

Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia