- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-483/12: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof — Belgium) — Pelckmans Turnhout NV v Walter Van Gastel Balen NV and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Principles of equality and non-discrimination — Implementation of EU law — Scope of application of EU law — None — Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012CA0483
62012CA0483
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.6.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 202/4
(Case C-483/12) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Principles of equality and non-discrimination - Implementation of EU law - Scope of application of EU law - None - Lack of jurisdiction of the Court))
2014/C 202/05
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Pelckmans Turnhout NV
Defendants: Walter Van Gastel Balen NV, Walter Van Gastel NV, Walter Van Gastel Lifestyle NV, Walter Van Gastel Schoten NV
Intervening parties: Ministerraad
Re:
Request for a preliminary ruling — Grondwettelijk Hof — Belgium — Interpretation of Article 6(3) TEU, Articles 34, 35, 36, 56 and 57 TFEU, and Articles 15, 16, 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — National legislation requiring retail establishments to close one day per week — Exceptions provided for in respect of retailers established in certain places or marketing certain products
Operative part of the judgment
The Court of Justice of the European Union has no jurisdiction to answer the question referred by the Grondwettelijk Hof (Belgium).
*
Language of the case: Dutch.
* * *
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.