I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2015/C 354/51)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cyrus Wellness Consulting GmbH (Berlin, Germany)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘VIEWTY PRO’ — Application for registration No 9 125 071
Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 June 2015 in Case R 1940/2014-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order OHIM to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.