I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 92(1), 103(1) and the second subparagraph of 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure – Wine sector – Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 and Regulation (EC) No 343/94 – Answer to the question admitting of no reasonable doubt – Manifest inadmissibility
Re:
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Tribunale di Bari – Wine sector – Compulsory distillation system – 1993/94 wine year – Scope ratione temporis of Council Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 of 16 March 1987 on the common organisation of the market in wine (OJ 1987 L 84, p. 1) – Repeal of that regulation by Commission Regulation (EC) No 343/94 of 15 February 1994 opening compulsory distillation as provided for in Article 39 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 and derogating for the 1993/94 wine year from certain detailed rules for the application thereof (OJ 1994 L 44, p. 9) – Administrative sanction under national law for infringements of Regulation No 882/87 – Applicability in the case of infringement of Regulation No 343/94 – Proportionality of the administrative sanction imposed.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 343/94 of 15 February 1994 opening compulsory distillation as provided for in Article 39 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 and derogating for the 1993/94 wine year from certain detailed rules for the application thereof implements Regulation No 822/87 without either repealing or replacing it.