EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-84/12: Order of the General Court of 4 July 2014 — Uspaskich v Parliament (Action for annulment and compensation — Privileges and immunities — Member of the European Parliament — Decision to waive immunity — Re-examination — Decision not to defend immunity — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TB0084

62012TB0084

July 4, 2014
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

22.9.2014

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/12

(Case T-84/12)(Action for annulment and compensation - Privileges and immunities - Member of the European Parliament - Decision to waive immunity - Re-examination - Decision not to defend immunity - Inadmissibility - Manifest inadmissibility)

2014/C 329/15

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Parties

Applicant: Viktor Uspaskich (Kėdainiai, Lithuania) (represented by: A. Raišutis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Lorenz, M. Windisch and L. Mašalaitė-Chouteau, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Lithuania (represented by: D. Kriaučiūnas and V. Balčiūnaitė, acting as Agents)

Re:

Firstly, an application for annulment of the Parliament’s decision of 1 December 2011 not to defend the applicant’s parliamentary immunity and to reject his application for re-examination of the decision to waive immunity and, secondly, a claim for damages.

Operative part of the order

1.The action is dismissed as in part manifestly inadmissible and in part inadmissible.

2.Mr Viktor Uspaskich shall bear his own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Parliament.

3.The Republic of Lithuania shall bear its own costs.

Language of the case: Lithuanian

(1) OJ C 126, 28.4.2012.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia