EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-216/25, GSP Offshore: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanța (Romania) lodged on 19 March 2025 – ZN v GSP Offshore SRL

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025CN0216

62025CN0216

March 19, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2025/3496

7.7.2025

(Case C-216/25, GSP Offshore)

(C/2025/3496)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant and appellant: ZN

Defendant and respondent: GSP Offshore SRL

Questions referred

Is Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/23/EC (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) to be interpreted as:

precluding the application of a general provision of national law which makes the transfer of an obligation between two debtors subject to the creditor’s consent, in the case of a transfer governed by that directive, concerning the transferor’s obligations arising from a contract of employment or an employment relationship existing on the date of the transfer, which are transferred to the transferee?

meaning that the exception provided for in the second subparagraph of that paragraph can be regarded as having been established by a general provision of national law adopted after the law transposing the directive – a general provision making the transfer of an obligation between two debtors subject to the creditor’s consent – or must that exception be established through a special legislative provision?

If Questions 1(a) and 1(b) are answered in the negative, can Article 8 of Directive 2001/23/EC be interpreted as permitting States (including courts) to apply a general provision which makes the transfer, from the transferor to the transferee, of obligations relating to remuneration arising before the transfer subject to the creditor employee’s consent, as a more favourable provision than the first subparagraph of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/23/EC, as transposed by a specific national law?

(1) Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees’ rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses (OJ 2001 L 82, p. 16).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3496/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia