- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-76/23, Cobult: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 13 February 2023 — Cobult UG v TAP Air Portugal SA
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0076
62023CN0076
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.5.2023
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 189/10
(Case C-76/23, Cobult)
(2023/C 189/15)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Cobult UG
Defendant: TAP Air Portugal SA
Question referred
Must Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) be interpreted as meaning that a signed agreement of the passenger on the reimbursement of the cost of the ticket with a travel voucher within the meaning of the first indent of Article 8(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 exists where the passenger selects a voucher of this type on the website of the operating air carrier to the exclusion of a subsequent refund of the cost of the ticket in monetary form and receives it by email, while reimbursement of the cost of the ticket in monetary form is only possible after first contacting the operating air carrier?
(1) Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).