- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-66/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Poznań-Grunwald i Jeżyce w Poznaniu (Poland) lodged on 7 February 2017 — Grzegorz Chudaś and Irena Chudaś v DA Deutsche Allgemeine Versicherung Aktiengesellschaft AG
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017CN0066
62017CN0066
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
22.5.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 161/8
(Case C-66/17)
(2017/C 161/10)
Language of the case: Polish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: Grzegorz Chudaś and Irena Chudaś
Defendant: DA Deutsche Allgemeine Versicherung Aktiengesellschaft AG
Question referred
Should Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims (1) ... (‘Regulation No 805/2004’), read in conjunction with Article 7 of that regulation, be interpreted as meaning that a European Enforcement Order certificate may be issued in respect of a decision concerning reimbursement of the costs of proceedings contained in a judgment in which a court has established the existence of a right?
(1) OJ 2004 L 143, p. 15.
Language of the case: Polish
* * *