- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-767/14: Action brought on 17 November 2014 — Boomkwekerij van Rijn-de Bruyn v CPVO — Artevos and Dachverband Kulturpflanzen- und Nutztiervielfalt (Oksana)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0767
62014TN0767
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
9.2.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 46/53
(Case T-767/14)
(2015/C 046/69)
Language in which the application was lodged: Dutch
Parties
Applicant: Boomkwekerij van Rijn-de Bruyn BV (Uden, Netherlands) (represented by: P. Jonker, lawyer)
Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO)
Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Artevos GmbH (Karlsruhe, Germany) and Dachverband Kulturpflanzen- und Nutztiervielfalt eV (Bielefeld, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before the CPVO
Applicant for Community plant variety right: applicant
Community plant variety right at issue: Oksana — application No 2005/1046
Contested decision: decision of the Board of Appeal of the CPVO of 2 July 2014 in Case A 007/2013
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—consequently, uphold the applicant’s appeal against decisions R 1232, OBJ 13-086, OBJ 13-087, OBJ 13-088 and OBJ 13-090 of the CPVO, find that the applicant’s variety is (sufficiently) new within the meaning of Article 10 of Regulation No 2100/94 and grant a Community plant variety right for the applicant’s variety;
—order the CPVO and the other parties to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—infringement of Articles 10 and 76 of Regulation No 2100/94.