- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-784/17: Order of the General Court of 12 March 2019 — Strabag Belgium v Parliament (Action for annulment — Public works contracts — Tender procedure — General contractor works for European Parliament buildings in Brussels — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid and award of the contract to other tenderers — Replacement of the contested measure in the course of the proceedings — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TB0784(02)
62017TB0784(02)
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
6.5.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 155/43
(Case T-784/17) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - Public works contracts - Tender procedure - General contractor works for European Parliament buildings in Brussels - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid and award of the contract to other tenderers - Replacement of the contested measure in the course of the proceedings - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2019/C 155/52)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Strabag Belgium (Antwerp, Belgium) (represented by: initially by M. Schoups, K. Lemmens and M. Lahbib, and subsequently by M. Schoups and K. Lemmens, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: Z. Nagy and B. Simon, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the Parliament of 24 November 2017 rejecting the applicant’s tender and awarding to five tenderers a framework contract involving general contractor works for Parliament buildings in Brussels (Belgium) (call for tenders 06D20/2017/M036) and, second, an order for the Parliament to produce various documents.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action;
2.The European Parliament is ordered to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures;
3.The head of claim requesting that the Parliament be ordered to pay ‘procedural compensation’ is rejected as inadmissible.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2019155EN.01004302-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2019155EN.01004302-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 32, 29.1.2018.