EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of 6 April 1982. # Ulrich Wölker v Commission of the European Communities. # Case 89/82 R.

ECLI:EU:C:1982:125

61982CO0089

April 6, 1982
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Avis juridique important

61982O0089

European Court reports 1982 Page 01323

Parties

ULRICH WOLKER , HEIDELBERG ,

APPLICANT ,

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ,

DEFENDANT ,

Grounds

APPLICATION TO SUSPEND THE OPERATION OF A DECISION BY WHICH THE COMMISSION ORDERED THAT THE APPLICANT BE NOT ADMITTED TO THE TESTS FOR COMPETITION COM/A/324 - LEGAL ASPECTS .

BY A TELEX MESSAGE RECEIVED AT THE COURT REGISTRY ON 18 MARCH 1982 THE COMMISSION NOTIFIED THE COURT THAT IT HAD DECIDED AT ITS MEETING ON 17 MARCH 1982 TO POSTPONE THE WRITTEN TESTS FOR THE COMPETITION AT ISSUE .

IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES THE DEFENDANT TAKES THE VIEW THAT THE APPLICATION FOR THE ADOPTION OF INTERIM MEASURES HAS LOST ITS PURPOSE FOR THE TIME BEING AND ASKS THE COURT TO DECLARE THAT THERE ARE NO GROUNDS FOR COMING TO A DECISION ON THIS APPLICATION AT THE PRESENT TIME .

BY LETTER OF 22 MARCH 1982 , RECEIVED AT THE COURT REGISTRY ON 23 MARCH 1982 , THE APPLICANT DECLARED THAT THE PROCEEDINGS ON THE INTERLOCUTORY MEASURE WERE AT AN END AND CLAIMED THAT THE COURT SHOULD ORDER THE DEFENDANT TO PAY THE COSTS ARISING FROM THE PROCEEDINGS ON THE APPLICATION FOR THE ADOPTION OF AN INTERIM MEASURE .

BY LETTER OF 2 APRIL 1982 , REGISTERED AT THE COURT ON 5 APRIL 1982 , THE DEFENDANT CONTENDED THAT THE COSTS SHOULD BE RESERVED . IT STATED THAT THE APPLICANT WAS IN AGREEMENT ON THIS POINT .

Operative part

HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS :

1 . THERE ARE NO GROUNDS FOR COMING TO A DECISION ON THIS APPLICATION FOR THE ADOPTION OF AN INTERIM MEASURE .

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia