I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Civil service - Officials - Surviving spouse - Liability - Material and non-material damage - Res judicata - Partial inadmissibility - Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Equal treatment - Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2025/2547)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: BT (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland, M. Brauhoff and G. Niddam, acting as Agents)
By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks compensation, first, for the material damage she claims to have suffered as a result the European Commission’s decision of 24 February 2023 refusing her request of 24 October 2022 for the reinstatement, ex-gratia, of a survivor’s pension and, second, for the non-material damage she claims to have suffered as a result of the improper handling of her request of 24 October 2022.
The action is dismissed as in part inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
There is no need to rule on the application to intervene made by the International Association of Former Officials of the European Union (AIACE).
BT shall pay the costs.
—
(1)
OJ C C/2024/3176, 21.5.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2547/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—