- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-143/14: Action brought on 3 March 2014 — EE v OHIM (Device of a yellowy pattern)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0143
62014TN0143
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
5.5.2014
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 135/57
(Case T-143/14)
2014/C 135/74
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: EE Ltd (Hatfield, United Kingdom) (represented by: P. Brownlow, Solicitor)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 November 2013 given in Case R 703/2013-2.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: The figurative trade mark representing a device of a yellowy pattern for goods and services in Classes 7, 9, 16, 25, 35-39, 41, 42 and 45 — Community trade mark application No 11 388 311
Decision of the Examiner: Found the mark applied for not eligible for registration
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) CTMR.