I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2020/C 45/70)
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: Tazzetti, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: M. Condinanzi, E. Ferrero and C. Vivani, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare the contested decisions void, after finding that they are unlawful and, where appropriate, after disapplying Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/661, in particular Article 7 thereof;
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
The present action seeks (i) the annulment of Commission Decision (note) ARES (2019) 6048224 of 30 September 2019, addressed to the applicant, of Commission Decision (note) ARES (2019) 6014426 of 27 September 2019, addressed to Tazzetti SpA, Commission Decision (note) ARES (2019) 6024220 of 27 September 2019, addressed to Tazzetti SpA, as well as of subsequent decisions, and, (ii) where necessary, after finding, pursuant to Article 277 TFEU, that Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/661 of 25 April 2019 ensuring the smooth functioning of the electronic registry for quotas for placing hydrofluorocarbons on the market (OJ 2019 L 112, p. 11), in particular Article 7 thereof, is unlawful, a declaration of inapplicability, and as a result, the annulment of the aforementioned decisions implementing that regulation.
The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-825/19, Tazzetti v Commission.