EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-826/19: Action brought on 4 December 2019 — Tazzetti v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0826

62019TN0826

December 4, 2019
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

10.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/85

(Case T-826/19)

(2020/C 45/70)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Tazzetti, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: M. Condinanzi, E. Ferrero and C. Vivani, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

declare the contested decisions void, after finding that they are unlawful and, where appropriate, after disapplying Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/661, in particular Article 7 thereof;

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The present action seeks (i) the annulment of Commission Decision (note) ARES (2019) 6048224 of 30 September 2019, addressed to the applicant, of Commission Decision (note) ARES (2019) 6014426 of 27 September 2019, addressed to Tazzetti SpA, Commission Decision (note) ARES (2019) 6024220 of 27 September 2019, addressed to Tazzetti SpA, as well as of subsequent decisions, and, (ii) where necessary, after finding, pursuant to Article 277 TFEU, that Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/661 of 25 April 2019 ensuring the smooth functioning of the electronic registry for quotas for placing hydrofluorocarbons on the market (OJ 2019 L 112, p. 11), in particular Article 7 thereof, is unlawful, a declaration of inapplicability, and as a result, the annulment of the aforementioned decisions implementing that regulation.

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-825/19, Tazzetti v Commission.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia