- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-911/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 July 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Fédération bancaire française (FBF) v Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution (ACPR) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 263 and 267 TFEU — EU act which is not legally binding — Judicial review — Guidelines issued by the European Banking Authority (EBA) — Product oversight and governance arrangements for retail banking products — Validity — Competence of the EBA)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0911
62019CA0911
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 382/3
(Case C-911/19) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Articles 263 and 267 TFEU - EU act which is not legally binding - Judicial review - Guidelines issued by the European Banking Authority (EBA) - Product oversight and governance arrangements for retail banking products - Validity - Competence of the EBA)
(2021/C 382/03)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Fédération bancaire française (FBF)
Defendant: Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution (ACPR)
Operative part of the judgment
1.Article 263 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that measures such as the guidelines of the European Banking Authority (EBA), of 22 March 2016, on product oversight and governance arrangements for retail banking products (EBA/GL/2015/18) may not be the object of an action for annulment under that article;
2.Article 267 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that the Court has jurisdiction, under that article, to assess the validity of measures such as the guidelines of the European Banking Authority (EBA), of 22 March 2016, on product oversight and governance arrangements for retail banking products (EBA/GL/2015/18);
3.EU law does not require that the admissibility, before a national jurisdiction, of a plea of illegality directed against an EU measure be subject to the condition that that measure directly and individually concerns the person relying on that plea;
4.Consideration of the third question referred for a preliminary ruling has not disclosed any factor of such a kind as to affect the validity of the guidelines of the European Banking Authority, of 22 March 2016, on product oversight and governance arrangements for retail banking products (EBA/GL/2015/18).
(*) Language of the case: French.