- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-427/18: Judgment of the General Court of 31 January 2019 — Geske v EUIPO (SATISFYERMEN) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark SATISFYERMEN — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Duty to state reasons — First sentence of Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TA0427
62018TA0427
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 103/42
(Case T-427/18) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((EU trade mark - Application for the EU figurative mark SATISFYERMEN - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Duty to state reasons - First sentence of Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2019/C 103/56)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: André Geske (Lübbecke, Germany) (represented by: R. Albrecht, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Sesma Merino and S. Hanne, Agents)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 May 2018 (Case R 2603/2017-1), relating to the application for registration of the figurative mark SATISFYERMEN as an EU trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Mr André Geske to pay the costs.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2019103EN.01004201-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2019103EN.01004201-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 301, 27.8.2018.