EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-560/23, Tang: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Flygtningenævnet København (Denmark) lodged on 8 September 2023 — H (assisted by DRC Dansk Flygtningehjælp) v Udlændingestyrelsen

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0560

62023CN0560

September 8, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2023/645

13.11.2023

(Case C-560/23, Tang (*)

(C/2023/645)

Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: H (assisted by DRC Dansk Flygtningehjælp)

Defendant: Udlændingestyrelsen

Question referred

Are the time limit provisions in Article 29(1) and (2) of the Dublin III Regulation (**) to be interpreted as meaning that the time limit of six months laid down in the second part of Article 29(1) of that regulation is to run from the final, substantive decision in the case, in a situation where an appellate body in the requesting Member State, as referred to in Article 27 of the Dublin III Regulation, has remitted the transfer case back to the competent authority at first instance, which subsequently made a fresh transfer decision more than six months after receipt of the acceptance by the Member State responsible, including where the remittal is based on the fact that the Member State responsible, which had initially accepted the transfer, subsequently decided to suspend all transfers under the Dublin III Regulation, and where suspensive effect has been granted as regards the removal of the person concerned?

(*) The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(**) Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 31).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/645/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia