- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-249/15: Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2017 — JT v EUIPO — Carrasco Pirard (QUILAPAYÚN) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark QUILAPAYÚN — Relative ground for refusal — Well-known mark — Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Proprietor of the mark)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TA0249
62015TA0249
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.1.2018
Official Journal of the European Union
C 32/20
(Case T-249/15)(1)
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark QUILAPAYÚN - Relative ground for refusal - Well-known mark - Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Proprietor of the mark))
(2018/C 032/26)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: JT (represented by: A. Mena Valenzuela, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Zaera Cuadrado, acting as Agent)
Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Eduardo Carrasco Pirard (Santiago, Chili) and the 7 other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO whose names are listed in the Annex to the judgment
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 March 2015 (Case R 354/2014-2), relating to opposition proceedings between, on the one hand, JT, and, on the other, Mr Carrasco Pirard and the other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal whose names are listed in the Annex.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 March 2015 (Case R 354/2014-2);
2.Dismisses the remaining heads of claim in the application;
3.Orders each party to bear its own costs.
(1) OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.