- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-330/24: Action brought on 1 July 2024 – KF v EIB
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0330
62024TN0330
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/4872
12.8.2024
(Case T-330/24)
(C/2024/4872)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: KF (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)
Defendant: European Investment Bank
Forms of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare the present action admissible and well founded;
—annul the decision of the EIB of 25 March 2024;
—order the EIB to grant compensation for the applicant’s non-pecuniary damage, assessed at EUR 50 000;
—order the EIB to pay all the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of her action against the decision of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 25 March 2024, by which the EIB defined its final position regarding implementation of the amicable settlement agreement ending the dispute in Case T-37/21, KF v EIB, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging breach of the agreement concluded under the auspices of the Court pursuant to Article 125b of the Rules of Procedure, which brought to an end the proceedings in Case T-37/21, KF v EIB.
2.Second plea in law, alleging breach of the duty to state reasons.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4872/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—