- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-276/21: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — Moio v EUIPO — Paul Hartmann (moio.care) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark moio.care — Earlier EU word mark Molicare — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TA0276
62021TA0276
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 237/51
(Case T-276/21) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark moio.care - Earlier EU word mark Molicare - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2022/C 237/64)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Moio GmbH (Fürth, Germany) (represented by: E. Grande García, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Paul Hartmann AG (Heidenheim, Germany)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 March 2021 (Case R 1034/2020-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Paul Hartmann and Moio.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Moio GmbH to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: German.
(1) OJ C 278, 12.7.2021.