- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-225/14: Action brought on 11 April 2014 — iNET24 Holding v OHIM (IDIRECT24)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0225
62014TN0225
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.6.2014
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 184/36
(Case T-225/14)
2014/C 184/58
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: iNET24 Holding AG (Feusisberg, Switzerland) (represented by: S. Kirschstein-Freund, B. Breitinger and V. Dalichau, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 4 February 2014 in Case R 1867/2013-5;
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: Designation of the European Union for the international registration of the word mark ‘IDIRECT24’ for goods and services in classes 9, 36, 38 and 42 — International registration No 1 145 181
Decision of the Examiner: Application refused
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed
Pleas in law:
—Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.