- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-366/17: Action brought on 5 June 2017 — Poland v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0366
62017TN0366
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
31.7.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 249/44
(Case T-366/17)
(2017/C 249/60)
Language of the case: Polish
Parties
Applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the European Commission of 23 March 2017 (notified under document C(2017) 1904 on 24 March 2017) refusing to make a financial contribution from the European Regional Development Fund to the major project ‘Starting production of a next-generation diesel engine by Volkswagen Motor Polska’, forming part of the Operational Programme ‘Innovative Economy’ and provided with structural aid within the framework of the ‘Convergence in Poland’ objective;
—order the European Commission to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging that the Commission erred in its assessment of the project ‘Starting production of a next-generation diesel engine by Volkswagen Motor Polska’ by deciding that, on account of its lack of innovation, that project is not guaranteed to be consistent with the priorities of the Operational Programme ‘Innovative Economy’ (Priority Axis IV of that programme), and that, consequently, it does not meet the requirements of Article 41(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 (OJ 2006 L 210, p. 25).
2.Second plea in law, alleging that the Commission infringed Article 41(2) of Regulation No 1083/2006 through flagrant contravention of the project assessment deadline.