I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark miababy - Earlier EU figurative mark ia BABY interapothek - Relative grounds for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/182)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Interapothek, SA (Santomera, Spain) (represented by: M. González Aleixandre, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Q4 Media SRL (Poiana Câmpina, Romania) (represented by: L. Lucaci, lawyer)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 31 October 2023 (Case R 1529/2023-1).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Interapothek, SA, the European Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and Q4 Media SRL each to bear their own costs.
—
Language of the case: English.
OJ C C/2024/1261, 12.2.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/182/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/182/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—