EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-36/23: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – Stevi and The New York Times v Commission (Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to the text messages exchanged between the President of the Commission and the chief executive officer of the pharmaceutical company Pfizer – Refusal to grant access – Presumption of veracity attached to the declaration of non-possession of documents – Lack of plausible explanations making it possible to determine the reasons for the non-existence or non-possession – Retention of documents – Principle of good administration)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TA0036

62023TA0036

May 14, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/3514

7.7.2025

(Case T-36/23)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to the text messages exchanged between the President of the Commission and the chief executive officer of the pharmaceutical company Pfizer - Refusal to grant access - Presumption of veracity attached to the declaration of non-possession of documents - Lack of plausible explanations making it possible to determine the reasons for the non-existence or non-possession - Retention of documents - Principle of good administration)

(C/2025/3514)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Matina Stevi (Brussels, Belgium), The New York Times Company (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: B. Kloostra and P.-J. Schüller, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Stancanelli, A. Spina and M. Burón Pérez, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Decision C(2022) 8371 final of the European Commission of 15 November 2022 adopted pursuant to Article 4 of the Implementing Rules to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43), concerning an application for access to all text messages exchanged between the President of the Commission and the chief executive officer of the pharmaceutical company Pfizer between 1 January 2021 and 11 May 2022.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

Annuls Decision C(2022) 8371 final of the European Commission of 15 November 2022 adopted pursuant to Article 4 of the Implementing Rules to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents;

Orders the Commission to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 112, 27.3.2023.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3514/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia