I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2022/C 326/29)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Applicant: Cayago Tec GmbH (Bad Salzuflen, Germany) (represented by: J. Güell Serra, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: iAqua (Shenzen) Ltd (Shenzen, China)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Design at issue: EU design (Personal watercraft, Motorboats) — EU design No 6 611 570-0001
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 April 2022 in Case R 951/2021-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision in its entirety;
—order EUIPO and the intervener in the proceedings before EUIPO to pay the costs.
Infringement of Article 25(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002, in conjunction with Articles 4 and 6 of that regulation.