EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-150/13: Action brought on 11 March 2013 — Ziegler Relocation v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TN0150

62013TN0150

March 11, 2013
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

25.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/22

(Case T-150/13)

2013/C 147/40

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Ziegler Relocation SA (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J.-F. Bellis, M. Favart and A. Bailleux, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

join the present action to Case T-539/12;

declare the present action admissible and well-founded;

hold that the European Union has incurred non-contractual liability as regards the applicant;

order the European Union to pay the applicant the sum of EUR 112 872,50 per year from 11 March 2008, together with interest until payment in full;

order the European Union to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The damage in respect of which the applicant seeks compensation from the European Union concerns the loss of earnings which it claims to have suffered since the adoption of the Commission’s decision of 11 March 2008 in Case COMP/38.543 — International removal services as a result of the practice of European Union officials to request cover quotes in the context of removals the costs of which are reimbursed in accordance with the status of European Union officials has not ceased. The applicant’s refusal to respond favourably to such requests has the effect of removing it from the markets concerned, to the extent that it no longer supplies removal services to more than a very limited number of officials of the European institutions. It is a failure on the part of the European Union to fulfil its duty of care which is the cause of the loss thus suffered by the applicant.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia