I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-103/15) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(State aid - Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law on renewable energy sources - Annulment of the act criticised by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2019/C 295/38)
Language of the case: German
Applicants: Flabeg Deutschland GmbH (Nuremberg, Germany) (represented initially by: M. Küper and E.–M. Schwind, and subsequently by: J. Stein and A. Kersten, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, and subsequently by: T. Maxian Rusche and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents, and by H. Wollmann, lawyer)
Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1585 of 25 November 2014 on the aid scheme SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (implemented by Germany for the support of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users) (OJ 2015 L 250, p. 122).
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the case.
2.The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Flabeg Deutschland GmbH.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 138, 27.4.2015.