- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 1 June 1999. # Karl L. Meyer v Commission of the European Communities. # Action for annulment and damages - Action manifestly inadmissible and without any foundation in law. # Case T-71/99.
ECLI:EU:T:1999:115
61999TO0071
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Avis juridique important
61999B0071
European Court reports 1999 Page II-01727
Summary
Keywords
Actions for annulment - Action contesting a Commission decision refusing emergency aid not provided for under the Community rules - Action manifestly unfounded (EC Treaty, Art. 173, fourth para. (now, after amendment, Art. 230, fourth para., EC); Fourth ACP-EEC Convention signed at Lomé on 15 December 1989, Art. 366; Council Decision 91//482)
Summary
An action must be dismissed as manifestly unfounded where it is brought by a farmer in French Polynesia against a Commission decision refusing him emergency aid which he had requested in order to repair cyclone damage to his plantation. Council Decision 91/482 on the association of the overseas countries and territories with the European Economic Community makes no provision for the Community to grant individuals emergency aid on request in the event of natural disasters. Nor does Article 366 of the Fourth Lomé Convention mention the payment of special emergency aid to individuals established in the territory of one of the ACP States.