- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-69/21: Judgment of the General Court of 15 December 2021 — Rotondaro v EUIPO — Pollini (COLLINI) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark COLLINI — Earlier EU and national word marks POLLINI and STUDIO POLLINI — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TA0069
62021TA0069
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.2.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 73/40
(Case T-69/21) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark COLLINI - Earlier EU and national word marks POLLINI and STUDIO POLLINI - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2022/C 73/48)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Carmine Rotondaro (Monaco, Monaco) (represented by: M. Locatelli, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Capostagno, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Pollini SpA (Gatteo, Italy) (represented by: F. Sanna, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 December 2020 (Case R 2518/2019-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Pollini and Mr Rotondaro.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Mr Carmine Rotondaro to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: Italian
ECLI:EU:C:2022:140