EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-456/22, Gemeinde Ummendorf: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 14 December 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Ravensburg — Germany) — VX, AT v Gemeinde Ummendorf (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of personal data — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Article 82 — Right to compensation and liability — Concept of ‘non-material damage’ — Online publication of the agenda for a municipal council meeting containing personal data — Publication without the consent of the data subjects — Claim of those data subjects seeking compensation for non-material damage)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0456

62022CA0456

December 14, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2024/1072

(Case C-456/22, (1) Gemeinde Ummendorf)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of personal data - Regulation (EU) 2016/679 - Article 82 - Right to compensation and liability - Concept of ‘non-material damage’ - Online publication of the agenda for a municipal council meeting containing personal data - Publication without the consent of the data subjects - Claim of those data subjects seeking compensation for non-material damage)

(C/2024/1072)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: VX, AT

Defendant: Gemeinde Ummendorf

Operative part of the judgment

Article 82(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation),

must be interpreted as precluding national legislation or a national practice which sets a ‘de minimis threshold’ in order to establish non-material damage caused by an infringement of that regulation. The data subject is required to show that the consequences of the infringement which he or she claims to have suffered constitute damage which differs from the mere infringement of the provisions of that regulation.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1072/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

*

Language of the case: German.

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia