I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(C/2025/3873)
Language of the case: Italian
Appellants: UD, VO, GT and KJ, in their own names and as members of the agricultural holding UD e co., BF, in their own name and as owner of the agricultural holding bearing the same name, IJ, BP and LR, in their own names and as members of the agricultural holding IJ, BP e LR s.s.
Respondent: Agenzia Veneta per i pagamenti (AVEPA)
Should [EU] law, in particular Articles 23 and 24(1) of Regulation (EC) No 595/2004 (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) – and, before that, Articles 13 and 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1392/2001 (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">2</span>) – and the principles of legal certainty, legitimate expectations, proportionality, equality and non-discrimination, be interpreted as precluding a provision of national law that, in the event of delivery to a non-approved purchaser, requires that the milk or milk equivalent delivered is subject to an additional levy payable by the producer?
—
(1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 595/2004 of 30 March 2004 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 1788/2003 establishing a levy in the milk and milk products sector (OJ 2004 L 94, p. 22).
(2) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1392/2001 of 9 July 2001 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 establishing an additional levy on milk and milk products (OJ 2001 L 187, p. 19).
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3873/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—