- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-175/10: Order of the General Court of 21 March 2011 — Milux v OHIM (FERTILITYINVIVO) (Community trade mark — Representation of the applicant by a lawyer who is not a third party — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TB0175
62010TB0175
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.5.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 145/28
(Case T-175/10)(<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Representation of the applicant by a lawyer who is not a third party - Inadmissibility)
2011/C 145/47
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Milux Holding SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: J. Bojs, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 February 2010 (Case R 1116/2009-4), concerning the application for registration of the word sign FERTILITYINVIVO as a Community trade mark
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.Milux Holding SA is ordered to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 161, 19.6.2010.
Language of the case: English