EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the President of the Court of 7 August 1964. # Fulvio Fonzi v Commission of the EAEC. # Case 30-64 R.

ECLI:EU:C:1964:67

61964CO0030

August 7, 1964
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Avis juridique important

61964O0030

European Court reports French edition Page 00658 Dutch edition Page 00752 German edition Page 00698 Italian edition Page 00596 English special edition Page 00518

Parties

IN CASE 30/64 R

FULVIO FONZI, ENGINEER, A SCIENTIFIC OFFICIAL OF THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY RESIDING AT SESTO CALENDE ( VARESE, ITALY ), REPRESENTED AND ASSISTED BY MARIO GIULIANO, PROFESSOR IN THE FACULTY OF LAW OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MILAN, WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE CHAMBERS OF ERNEST ARENDT, 6 RUE WILLY-GOERGEN,

APPLICANT,

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY ITS LEGAL ADVISER, M . PRELLE, ACTING AS AGENT, WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE OFFICE OF MR MANZANARES, SECRETARY OF THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT OF THE EUROPEAN EXECUTIVES, 2 PLACE DE METZ,

DEFENDANT,

Subject of the case

APPLICATION FOR THE SUSPENSION OF THE OPERATION OF THE DECISION TAKEN BY THE COMMISSION IN RESPECT OF THE APPLICANT ON 24 JUNE 1964 CALLING ON HIM TO GO IMMEDIATELY TO BRUSSELS,

Grounds

WHEREAS IT APPEARS FROM THE OBSERVATIONS OF THE DEFENDANT THAT MR FONZI ACTUALLY WENT TO BRUSSELS ON 22 JULY 1964, AND FROM THERE TO JUELICH, WHERE HE HAD THE MEETING REGARDED AS NECESSARY BY THE COMMISION;

WHEREAS THE APPLICANT HAS NOT DISPUTED THAT THIS IS TRUE;

WHEREAS HIS CONDUCT AMOUNTS TO THE EXECUTION OF THE DECISION REFERRED TO IN HIS APPLICATION FOR SUSPENSION;

WHEREAS THE SAID APPLICATION IS THEREFORE OUT OF TIME;

WHEREAS SINCE FROM THE BEGINNING IT HAS BEEN LACKING IN SUBJECT MATTER, THE APPLICATION FOR SUSPENSION MUST BE DECLARED INADMISSIBLE;

Operative part

THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

HEREBY ORDERS :

1 . THE APPLICATION IS INADMISSIBLE;

2 . THE COSTS ARE RESERVED .

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia