- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-310/19 P: Appeal brought on 15 April 2019 by Boudewijn Schokker against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 8 February 2019 in Case T-817/17 Schokker v EASA
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CN0310
62019CN0310
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.7.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 255/17
—
(Case C-310/19 P)
(2019/C 255/25)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: Boudewijn Schokker (represented by: T. Martin and S. Orlandi, avocats)
Other party to the proceedings: European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Form of order sought
The appellant claims that the Court should:
—set aside the order of 8 February 2019 in Case T-817/17, Schokker v EASA;
—refer the case back to the General Court; and
—reserve the costs.
Grounds of appeal and main arguments
The appellant claims, first, that the General Court erred in law by dismissing the action on a ground that it had raised if its own motion and erroneously categorised as ‘manifest’. When it did so, the General Court infringed Article 126 of its Rules of Procedure and the appellant’s rights of defence.
The appellant submits, second, that the General Court erred in law by concluding that a verification of the grounds for the withdrawal of the offer of employment at issue was irrelevant, as an offer of employment can, in any case, be withdrawn at any moment without being subject to any conditions.
—