- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-327/22: Action brought on 31 May 2022 — PS v EEAS
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0327
62022TN0327
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.7.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 284/53
(Case T-327/22)
(2022/C 284/73)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: PS (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: European External Action Service
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the Defendant dated 23/07/2021 establishing an addendum of the Applicant’s contract and whereby his place of assignment was modified from Washington to Brussels as of 01/09/2021 and, in as far as necessary, annul the decision of the Defendant, dated 22/02/2022, rejecting the Applicant’s complaint filed on 20/10/2021, under Article 90(2) of the EU Staff Regulations;
—order the reimbursement of all the costs incurred by his lawyers for the present appeal.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
—First plea in law, alleging a breach of the principle of the interest of the service.
—Second plea in law, alleging a breach of the principle of assignment to an equivalent post.