- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-66/18: Action brought on 29 January 2018 — Tsapakidou v Court of Justice
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0066
62018TN0066
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.4.2018
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 134/25
(Case T-66/18)
(2018/C 134/35)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Argyro Tsapakidou (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: E. Kleani, lawyer)
Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the Court of Justice of 23 November 2017 (reference 20173939) rejecting the applicant’s tender submitted in respect of the freelance translator contract notice 2017/S 002-001564 for the Greek language;
—order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant maintains that the contested decision breaches the general principles of EU law, according to which administrative acts must be sufficiently justified and state the principles on which they are based. It fails to meet these criteria. The applicant argues, in particular, that the justification provided by the defendant was insufficient in light of Article 4.3.1. of the tender specifications. Moreover, the information provided to the applicant did not enable her to assess the validity of the result obtained in the test translation in question. She lacked information regarding the evaluation guidelines or criteria on the basis of which the contested decision was adopted.