I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(1)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Free movement of capital and liberalisation of payments - Article 63 TFEU - Restrictions - Tax rules - National legislation which permits the automatic taxation of undeclared assets held abroad, the origin and manner of acquisition of which have not been established - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Requirement to present the factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling - Lack of sufficient information - Manifestly inadmissible)
(C/2025/3257)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: TJ
Defendant: Direction régionale des finances publiques d’Île-de-France et de Paris
The request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre (France), made by decision of 10 January 2024, received at the Court on 23 February 2024, is manifestly inadmissible.
—
(1) OJ C C/2024/3441.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3257/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—