EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-229/25, MVCI Holidays and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 2 de Marbella (Spain) lodged on 25 March 2025 – GQ, IF v MVCI Management, SL, MVCI Holidays, SL, MCVI Playa Andaluza Holidays, SL

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025CN0229

62025CN0229

March 25, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/4263

11.8.2025

(Case C-229/25, MVCI Holidays and Others)

(C/2025/4263)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: GQ, IF

Defendants: MVCI Management, SL, MVCI Holidays, SL, MCVI Playa Andaluza Holidays, SL

Questions referred

Should Directives 94/47/EC (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) and 2008/122/EC (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">2</span>) and the case-law of the CJEU on the principle of effectiveness of EU law be interpreted as not precluding a national rule or case-law that establishes the starting point for the limitation period for bringing an action for restitution at the time when a timeshare or similar contract is concluded, in cases where the contract is fundamentally null and void because of circumstances that are directly discernible from the time when it was concluded, such as the excessively long duration of the contract or a failure to clearly specify its subject matter?

Should Directives 94/47/EC and 2008/122/EC and the case-law of the CJEU on the principle of effectiveness of EU law be interpreted as not precluding a national rule or case-law that establishes the starting point for the limitation period for an action to recover the amount of the contract price as a penalty for having received advance payments at the time when the prohibited payments were made under a timeshare or similar contract?

Directive 94/47/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 26 October 1994 on the protection of purchasers in respect of certain aspects of contracts relating to the purchase of the right to use immovable properties on a timeshare basis (OJ 1994 L 280, p. 83).

Directive 2008/122/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 January 2009 on the protection of consumers in respect of certain aspects of timeshare, long-term holiday product, resale and exchange contracts (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ 2009 L 33, p. 10).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4263/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia