- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-370/24: Action brought on 22 July 2024 – EP v Parliament
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0370
62024TN0370
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/5425
16.9.2024
(Case T-370/24)
(C/2024/5425)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: EP (represented by: L. Levi and P. Baudoux, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the Secretary-General of the Parliament of 4 October 2023 by which the applicant was not confirmed in her functions as head of unit;
—annul the decision of the Secretary-General of 23 October 2023 approving the transfer of the applicant to a different unit;
—in so far as necessary, annul the decision rejecting the applicant’s complaint, delivered on 17 April 2024 by the President of the Parliament;
—order the Parliament to compensate the applicant for the non-material harm caused;
—order the Parliament to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment.
2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to be heard.
3.Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the duty to state reasons.
4.Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of the duty of care.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5425/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—