- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-629/24: Action brought on 6 December 2024 – Ryanair v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0629
62024TN0629
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2025/738
10.2.2025
(Case T-629/24)
(C/2025/738)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Ryanair DAC (Swords, Ireland) (represented by: F.-C. Laprévote, E. Vahida, S. Rating, D. Pérez de Lamo and C. Cozzani, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the European Commission Decision of 26 September 2024 on State aid SA.57153–Germany – COVID-19 – Aid to Lufthansa, set forth in the European Commission letter of 26 September 2024 replying to Ryanair letter of 5 September 2024 formally requesting the European Commission to act pursuant to Article 265 TFUE to issue suspension and temporary recovery injunctions under Article 13(1) and (2) of the State aid Procedural Regulation (1); and
—order the European Commission to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging that the Commission erred in law in interpreting the requirements under Article 13, paragraphs 1 and 2(c) State Aid Procedural Regulation, thereby failing to consider the necessity to adopt a suspension and temporary recovery injunctions.
2.Second plea in law, alleging that the Commission misinterpreted its margin of discretion in issuing a suspension or recovery injunction under Articles 13(1) and (2) State Aid Procedural Regulation.
3.Third plea in law, alleging that the Commission manifestly erred in rejecting the Applicant’s request to adopt an interim recovery injunction under Article 13(2) State Aid Procedural Regulation.
4.Fourth plea in law, alleging that the Commission violated its duty to state reasons pursuant to Article 296(2) TFEU.
Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ 2015, L 248, p. 9).
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/738/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—