- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-520/22: Judgment of the General Court of 6 November 2024 – Karić v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of personal liability – Error of assessment – Proportionality)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0520
62022TA0520
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/60
(Case T-520/22)
(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine - Freezing of funds - Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States - List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States - Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list - Obligation to state reasons - Principle of personal liability - Error of assessment - Proportionality)
(C/2025/60)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Bogoljub Karić (Belgrade, Serbia) (represented by: W. Julié, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Van Overmeire, acting as Agent, and by B. Maingain and S. Remy, lawyers)
Re:
By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of:
—Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/881 of 3 June 2022 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 153, p. 77), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/876 of 3 June 2022 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 153, p. 1); and
—Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/421 of 24 February 2023 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine (OJ 2023 L 61, p. 41), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/419 of 24 February 2023 implementing Article 8a of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine (OJ 2023 L 61, p. 20); in so far as those acts concern the applicant.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Mr Bogoljub Karić to pay the costs.
Operative part of the judgment
* Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/60/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
ECLI:EU:C:2025:140
15
* * *