- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-297/20: Action brought on 22 May 2020 — Fashioneast and AM.VI. v EUIPO — Moschillo (RICH JOHN RICHMOND)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0297
62020TN0297
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
3.8.2020
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 255/22
(Case T-297/20)
(2020/C 255/28)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: Fashioneast Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg), AM.VI. Srl (Naples, Italy) (represented by: A. Camusso and M. Baghetti, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Moschillo Srl (Avellino, Italy)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietors of the trade mark at issue: Applicants before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark RICH JOHN RICHMOND — European Union trade mark No 3 815 149
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 March 2020 in Case R 1381/2019-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—declare the Applicant be discharged from the payment of all the fees and costs of the appeal and cancellation proceedings;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the procedure.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.