I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-105/20) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Decision to refer - Insufficient information as to the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling for the purposes of resolving the dispute in the main proceedings - Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)
(2021/C 138/20)
Language of the case: French
Tribunal de travail de Nivelles
Applicant: UF
Defendants: Partena, Assurances sociales pour travailleurs indépendants ASBL, Institut national d’assurances sociales pour travailleurs indépendants (Inasti), Union Nationale des Mutualités Libres (Partenamut) (UNMLibres)
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Tribunal du travail de Nivelles (Nivelles Labour Court, Belgium), by decision of 3 February 2020, is manifestly inadmissible.
(*)
Language of the case: French.
* * *