EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 March 2020.#Autostrada Wielkopolska S.A. v European Commission.#Rectification.#Case T-778/17 REC.

ECLI:EU:T:2020:116

62017TO0778

March 13, 2020
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

13 March 2020 (*1)

(Rectification)

In Case T‑778/17 REC,

applicant,

European Commission, represented by L. Armati, K. Herrmann and S. Noë, acting as Agents,

defendant,

supported by

Republic of Poland, represented by B. Majczyna and M. Rzotkiewicz, acting as Agents,

intervener,

APPLICATION for rectification of the judgment of 24 October 2019, Autostrada Wielkopolska v Commission (T‑778/17, EU:T:2019:756),

THE GENERAL COURT (Fourth Chamber),

composed of S. Gervasoni (Rapporteur), President, L. Madise and P. Nihoul, Judges,

Registrar: E. Coulon,

makes the following

1The Court delivered a judgment on 24 October 2019 Autostrada Wielkopolska v Commission (T‑778/17, EU:T:2019:756).

2In accordance with Article 164(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, the parties having been given an opportunity to submit their written observations pursuant to Article 164(3) of those rules, it is necessary to rectify, in the version in the language of the case, clerical mistakes or errors in calculation or obvious inaccuracies found in paragraph 66 of that judgment.

On those grounds,

THE GENERAL COURT (Fourth Chamber) hereby orders:

In paragraph 66 of the judgment, in the version in the language of the case, is to be read as

‘Fourthly, the applicant cannot usefully argue that the Commission only became aware of the electronic files relating to financial models after the opening decision.’

instead of as

‘Fourthly, the applicant can usefully argue that the Commission only became aware of the electronic files relating to financial models after the opening decision.’

Luxembourg, 13 March 2020.

Registrar

President

*1 Language of the case: English.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia